揭露万锦市体育馆项目所带来的巨大负面影响的顾问报告在过去一直被深深隐藏,秘而不宣。随着该份耗费纳税人$70万元资金撰写的报告终于得见天日,Bob Mok在其系列专栏文章中详细披露了体育馆项目所存在的种种问题。
A consultant report that exposes a huge downside to the Markham Arena Project was kept as secret from the public over the past. As the report finally sees the light of day, Bob Mok’s serial column gives detailed account of problems with the project that cost $700,000 from citizens.

The proposed and now cancelled Markham Arena Project that divided the City of Markham residents into two camps is now history. Over the past few years, consultant reports costing over $700,000 paid for by citizens were shielded from public eyes. Now that the reports are finally released, we get to see information that was not available to the “opposition” camp throughout the campaign.

总体来讲,该体育馆项目存在巨大问题,而大众对此一直一无所知。一些市府成员不希望公开报告内容并不出人意料。多年来,万锦居民一直努力寻求公开保密的万锦体育馆顾问报告,现在万锦市府终于将最终报告公诸于众,而这主要还是要归功于市议员Karen Rea通过资讯自由和隐私保护委员会所做的不懈努力。

Overall there was a huge downside to the arena project of which the public was not made aware.  Little wonder that some at the City did not want the reports released.  After years of struggle to obtain the secret consultants' reports on the proposed Markham arena, the last report has finally been released by the City thanks to the efforts of Councillor Karen Rea, via the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Commission. 

The report has exposed a litany of problems with the project, most of which would have affected the bottom line and increased risk in a major way. Many costs were excluded, underestimated or understated while some revenues were overstated. There were serious concerns about inadequate returns for investors. Furthermore the reports indicate that adequate due diligence was lacking.


There were numerous concerns about too much financial risk and inadequate financial protection for Markham, both short term and long term. Some forecasts were described as "not useful" while others made "unrealistic assumptions". While Markham estimated that the project caused $39 million increase on Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Professor Humphreys’ assessment was that it had zero impact. Furthermore, projections for attendance and ticket sales were described as “too aggressive” and “overly ambitious”. 

Professor Humphreys himself said his reports had been "cherry picked". It is our firm belief that Markham residents and businesses deserved to hear the whole truth, not just that part of the truth some on Council and others wanted us to hear.  We feel the public was very poorly served by Markham’s one-sided approach to this very risky project, a project which we, many of our members, and many other Markham residents opposed from the beginning.


Next time, we will provide details on the controversial and/or unavailable information to the public (at that time), as revealed by these released reports now.

我们鼓励所有读者在我们的文章和博客上分享意见。We are committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion, so we ask you to avoid personal attacks, and please keep your comments relevant and respectful. Visit the FAQ page for more information.